2012-06-14

Men Still Necessary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_genetic_variation
Had chat with biologist friend. Silver lining. We both came to the expected June Stephenson-esque conclusion ("Men are not Cost-Effective"), but I think I've just seen the glass-is-half-full angle in what my buddy said is the only thing men are good for.

We've all heard articulated or imagined the militant feminist lesbian apocalypse (e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y:_The_Last_Man) in which all men are killed off (usually by virus? I've been thinking on writing on this theme for years now) and through artificial sperm or some kind of egg-egg artificial chromosome exchange process woman carry on the species on their own, never looking back as they ride onward into the bosom of a welcoming eutopian gynocracy.

It turns out that men are good for something, and that's sex (obviously) but sex is what keeps a species one step ahead of diseases and mainly parasites. It's all about genetic variability. For instance if there are ten men and ten women, there are one hundred different mating combinations while if there is only one man, there are only ten (but biologists always manage to complicate things from there). That's why there are as many men as women, even though it seems that many would argue that we could do with many, many, many fewer. Obviously, we could, but we'd end up with less genetic variability and we'd be circling the plughole as a species.

This article http://www.rense.com/general63/galaxyofgeneticdifferences.htm might put the kibosh on things, but somehow I don't think so.

In short, men are useless, but men and women are the same species and women apparently need men -- though perhaps even less than they even thought -- despite appearances ("A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" is a timeworn feminist refrain). Having said that, biological raison d'être notwithstanding, in principle we all still have minds (some of us, anyway) and are living beings and maybe even have "souls" if you want to go there, and so deserve some kind of equal consideration based upon merit, biological uselessness aside. We all may even have rights (because it's an easier system than trying to establish a 7-billion-person pecking order through centuries of bullying -- although the Japanese seem to be making a good go of it (^_^). And hey, your cat probably can't lift heavy loads or set up a basic computer spreadsheet, I'm guessing.

0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿