Mr. Chives, you really are an amusing person. It's amazing your command
of English and of rhetoric. To say that "using a bunch of African men as
lab rats [for a bogus reason] [is racist]" is to be AGAINST it.
Treating people like animals and experimenting on them is BAD. Yes, I'm
saying that people should not be treated as lab rats. Can you explain
how you misunderstood this?
Your ability to play and joke with
language amazes me, and I must be rather thick, since I do not get your
humor. Having said that, I consider this a serious subject and not fit
for humor, so please, if I could ask again, please keep things polite
and serious (as nonsense-free as you can manage and still inject your
special brand of humor).
I have pointed out the flaws, as I seem
them, in the research you cite, and you have yet to answer them. I know
you are a massive genius, and I expect you cannot get through the door
of your house because your brain is so gigantic, but the rest of us are
not so blessed. I for one, am quite stupid, so it is difficult for me to
grasp how surveys which do not say how they compensated for a 30%
longer exposure period in their control group, how they can CONCLUDE
that their data somehow PROVE that circumcision does not harm sexual
function when 34% said YES and 34% said NO (that seems IN-CONCLUSIVE to
me, but I'm stupid, as I said), and further, I found no reference to
which extent if any either control group or test group used condoms, to
cite still another example.
I know you're a genius and all these
seeming problems must be obvious to you, but can you please condescend
to me and the rest of us to explain how it still works out as PROOF of
Oh, I don't think you talk nonsense because you
disagree with me, I just think that because you're talking sheer
nonsense. Lots of people who agree with me talk nonsense too, and I try
to weigh both to decide if I may have the wrong viewpoint. It's fine, I
mean I think it shows you have a much more advanced sense of humor (and
vastly greater intelligence) than I, but I'm insulted for a couple of
reasons: a) you're insulting me with every post, using harsh language
and uncharitable personal allusions, and b) you keep talking sheer
nonsense DESPITE my having repeatedly asked you to stop, or at least let
me in on your genius-inspired and subtle sense of humor.and these jokes
I should say, however, that although I think you a
surpassing genius, a true giant among men and gods, I should say that I
can only be a bit slighted, as opposed to truly insulted, since to even
converse with you, let alone make valid points on any subject
is probably more than anyone of my insect-like mental faculties and command of language could ever hope for.
said that, if you're in fact NOT such a godlike figure, meaning my
belief, my CONCLUSION, is WRONG, which I must accept, as I have said
before, in the face of overwhelming facts and logic, and as some less
open-minded people, dare I say, benighted miscreants, might claim, you
are in fact a mere troll, and a foolish and arrogantly ignorant one at
that, i.e., a "grubsnark", whose words are worth less than nothing, I would not be insulted in that case either for obvious reasons.